Search Results for "Section 376 IPC"

1344 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1344 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Suresh Shankar Dethe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 506 (criminal in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Under Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Raju Suryawanshi, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of 9-Year-Old Child Under POCSO Act and IPC. The court held that the case falls within the 'rarest of rare' category due to the brutal nature of the crime and the vulnerability of the victim.

The case involves the confirmation of a death sentence awarded to the appellant, Pradip Rajesh Rajkumar Gupta, by the Additional Sessions Court at Val...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Testimony. Conviction under Section 376D IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was uncorroborated and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellants, Rohidas Manik Chavhan and Pravin Pundlik Rathod, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Darwha, in Special Case No.4/2015 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Convicts Advocate for Criminal Contempt for Disrupting Court Proceedings and Threatening Judge. Advocate's conduct of shouting, snatching notebook, and threatening judge amounts to criminal contempt under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The present criminal contempt petition was filed by Ashok Govindrao Bilolikar, the II Adhoc Additional District and Sessions Judge at Parbhani, under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Dismisses Petition to Quash Rape Charges Against Neighbor. High Court emphasizes non-consensual acts in intimate relationships; dismisses petitioner's plea, citing sufficient grounds in FIR and legal precedents.

The petitioner was accused of rape and other offenses by the complainant. Despite the petitioner's claim that the relationship was consensual, the cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Sexual Assault Under Sections 4 & 10 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Royston Xavier Parera, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act for offences under Sections 4 & 10 of the POCSO Act and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Section 377 IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Motive for False Implication. Conviction for Unnatural Sex Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Amidst Prior Enmity and Lack of Corroboration.

The appellant, Tillam Nalbahaddur Singh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, on 25 February 2013 in Sessions Case No. 452 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Quash Rape Case Based on False Promise of Marriage. Allegations of Sexual Assault Over 15 Years Under Threat of Viral Video and Extortion Not Fit for Quashing at Initial Stage.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the High Court's refusal to quash criminal proceedings for rape and other offences. The appellant was ac...