Search Results for "Reference court enhancement"

1570 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1570 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reduces Compensation for Orange Trees. Reference Court's enhancement of compensation for fruit-bearing trees set aside due to lack of evidence and improper application of multiplier method under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves an appeal by the Executive Engineer, Lower Wardha Project Division, against the Judgment and Award dated 27th February 2015 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Res Judicata Case — High Court Erred in Dismissing Second Appeal Without Considering Substantial Question of Law. The suit for declaration of title and possession was not barred by res judicata as the earlier suit did not adjudicate the rights of co-defendants.

The plaintiff-appellant, Har Narayan Tewari, filed Title Suit No.9/89 for declaration of title and possession over 0.30 acres of land (0.12 acres of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court's Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages in Service Termination Dispute. Stigmatic Termination Without Domestic Inquiry Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves two writ appeals arising from an order of a learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 75525/2013. The appellant in W.A. No. 100019/2020 is th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Challenge to Superannuation at Age 60, Holds AICTE Retirement Age of 65 Applicable to Private Self-Finance Standalone Institution. Goa Institute of Management's Faculty Manual Fixing Retirement Age at 60 is Overridden by AICTE Regulations.

The petitioner, Dr. Vilasini Devi Nair, was appointed as an Assistant Professor at the Goa Institute of Management (GIM), a private self-finance stand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint Against Accused No.4 in SC/ST Act Case for Lack of Hearing Under Section 340 Cr.P.C. — Opportunity of hearing is mandatory before making a complaint under Section 340 Cr.P.C. for offences relating to false evidence.

The petitioner, Liber A. Vaz, was working as a Second Division Assistant at the JMFC Court, Savanur. He was arrayed as accused No.4 in a case arising ...