Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

1971 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1971 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Property Dispute — Service of Summons Valid Through Vakalatnama Filed by Constituted Attorney

The case pertains to a suit filed by respondent No.1 (Bhavesha Suresh Goradia) against the appellant (Aviation Travels Pvt. Ltd.) and others seeking p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developers' Challenge to PMC's Differential Development Charges Policy. Held that imposing higher development charges on properties within 100 meters of DP road while exempting others violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, a group of developers and a real estate association, challenged the policy of the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) that imposed highe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Directions for Improvement of Healthcare Facilities in Government Hospitals in Goa in Public Interest Litigation. Court Holds That Right to Health is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21 of the Constitution and State Has a Legal Obligation to Provide Basic Medical Facilities.

This public interest litigation was filed by Prakash B. Sardessai and Vishwesh Sardessai, residents of Goa, seeking improvement of healthcare faciliti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Property Owners Against Attachment Under MPID Act — Property Not Proceeds of Crime. The court held that property owned by third parties not accused cannot be attached merely because the accused was in possession under a leave and licence agreement.

The appellants, Smt. Madhu Deepak Gogri and Mayank Deepak Gogri, are the owners of Shop Nos. 1 and 2 in Prem Bhanu Apartment, Borivali (West). The pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — Appellant's Prior User and Registration of Mark 'Shriphal' Establishes Prima Facie Case for Injunction.

The appellant, M/s. Mysore Deep Perfumery Household, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting agarbatti, scent, perfume, camphor, dho...