Search Results for "Majority rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Majority rule"

2451 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2451 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Examines Constitutional Validity of Consumer Protection Rules 2020 on Selection Committee and Tenure. Advocate and Sitting District Commission Members Challenge Rule 6(1) and Rule 10(2) Alleging Violation of Separation of Powers and Seeking Re-Appointment Eligibility.

20 Oct 2023

These three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench. The ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and RBI Circular on Stressed Assets Resolution. The Court held that the RBI circular dated 12.02.2018 is valid and not arbitrary, and that the requirement of 100% lender consent for restructuring and mandatory IBC reference for large accounts is within RBI's powers.

2 Apr 2019

The present batch of petitions and transferred cases challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Interim Application in Redevelopment Dispute – Plaintiff Seeks Eviction of Remaining Occupants under Development Agreement. Court Addresses Whether Non-Cooperating Occupants Can Be Compelled to Vacate Pending Suit Where Majority Have Already Vacated.

16 Oct 2025

This matter arises from an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Ambit Life Style Homes LLP, in a suit for enforcement of a registered developme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Consumer Protection Rules 2020 on Selection Committee Composition and Tenure. Petitioners challenge Rule 6(1) and Rule 10(2) of the Consumer Protection Rules, 2020 as violative of separation of powers and arbitrary, seeking declaration of eligibility for re-appointment.

20 Oct 2023

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, heard three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 6(1) and Rule 10...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Service Tax on Lottery Tickets Case — Holds That Service Tax on Promotion, Marketing, and Sale of Lottery Tickets Is Within Parliament's Competence Under Entry 97 List I Read With Article 248 of the Constitution, and Not Exclusively Within State's Domain Under Entry 62 List II. The Court upheld the constitutional validity of amendments to the Finance Act, 1994 levying service tax on services related to lotteries, reversing the Sikkim High Court's decision.

3 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals led by Union of India v. Future Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd., considered the constitutional validity of amendme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Recovery of Supervision Charges in Distillery License — Levy Upheld as Contractual Obligation Under Section 58A of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

10 Jul 2012

The petitioners, Sahakar Maharshi Bhausaheb Thorat Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandatory Video Recording of Court Proceedings; Court Finds No Fundamental Right to Such Recording and Leaves Policy Decision to High Court Administration.

7 Jan 2016

The Bombay High Court heard two petitions together: a writ petition by Sunil Shantisarup Gupta and a criminal application by Indur Kartar Chhugani, bo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Banks' Appeals in RBI Fraud Classification Case Regarding Natural Justice Requirements. Court Holds No Absolute Right to Personal Hearing or Full Forensic Audit Report Disclosure Under RBI Master Directions Issued Under Section 35A Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

7 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from the classification of loan accounts as 'fraud' by banks under the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions. The appellant bank...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...

82 83 84 85 86

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)