Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

2152 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2152 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Election Petition Alleging Improper Rejection of Votes and Irregular Draw of Lots. Court Examines Whether Returning Officer Erroneously Invalidated Votes Under Section 100(1)(d)(iii) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and Whether Section 65 Overrides Rule 75(4) of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961.

13 Jan 2015

The case involves an election petition filed under Section 81 read with Section 100(1)(d)(iii) and (iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Challenging Composition of Tree Authority Under Maharashtra Trees Act — Nominated Members Cannot Exceed Elected Members. Interpretation of Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act, 1975 requires parity between elected and nominated members in Tree Authority.

19 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Zoru Darayus Bhathena, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the composition of the Tree Authority for the Municipal Corporat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975. Revisional Authority Cannot Reopen Final Acquisition of Land as Private Forest Under Section 18 of M.P.F. Act.

29 Mar 2006

The Petitioner, Feroz Shabbar Hussain, claiming to be the legal representative of the deceased original holder, filed a writ petition challenging an o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree and Mesne Profit Order in Lease Dispute. Lease Deed Term Expired After Renewal Periods; Termination Notice Valid Under Section 41 of Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

2 Jul 2024

The case involves a lease dispute between landlords (respondents) and a tenant (applicant, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited). The landlords exe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tax on Medical Reimbursement Above Rs.15,000 as Perquisite Under Section 17(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Medical reimbursement exceeding Rs.15,000 per annum treated as taxable perquisite is not arbitrary or discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 or 21 of the Constitution.

13 Nov 2006

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by bank employees' associations and an individual officer challenging the constitutional validity of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Jurisdiction in Arbitration Claim Petition. Court holds that Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides a remedy against an arbitral award, not an interlocutory order, and that the petition is premature.

4 Sep 2025

The petitioner, a cooperative housing society, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 14th Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Demerger and Restructuring of Nocil Under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956. Court Approves Demerger of Petrochemicals and Polymer Division and Plastic Products Division into Two Separate Companies, Subject to Conditions Including Employee Protection and Compliance with Accounting Standards.

8 Jun 2005

The Bombay High Court considered three company petitions filed under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, by National Organic Chemical Indu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Private Religious Trust: Trust Not Entitled to Recover Agricultural Land for Personal Cultivation. The Court held that ‘to cultivate personally’ under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958, applies only to natural persons, not to juristic persons such as idols or Sansthans, and a private trust cannot claim possession under Sections 36 and 38.

19 Aug 1969

The dispute arose from a private religious trust, Kalanka Devi Sansthan, which derived its main income from endowed agricultural land. One parcel of l...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2012

2 Apr 2013

The Bombay High Court was seized with four writ petitions filed by various trade unions representing aircraft engineers, technical staff, and technici...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Respondent Vexatious Litigant Under Maharashtra Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 1971 for Habitually Filing Baseless Proceedings Against Tenant. Landlord-Tenant Dispute Leads to Declaration of Vexatious Litigant Due to Habitual Filing of Frivolous Applications and Abusive Conduct.

6 May 2011

The Advocate General for the State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 2(1) of the Maharashtra Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 1971, ...

82 83 84 85 86

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)