Search Results for "Gujarat High Court Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Gujarat High Court Rules"

2553 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2553 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging KERC Order Dated 14.05.2018. The Petitioners, Renewable Energy Companies, Seek to Quash the Regulatory Order.

13 Mar 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various renewable energy companies, including Renew Power Limited an...

High Court

High Court Upholds Tribunal Direction to Consider Creamy Layer Candidate Under General Merit, Rejects KPSC's Petition. Principle of Migration of Reserved Category Candidates to General Category on Merit Recognized as Settled Law.

21 Sep 2022

The Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC) invited applications for 440 Gazetted Probationers posts, including 55 Assistant Commercial of Commerci...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Concurrent Running of Sentences Under Section 482 CrPC for Multiple Convictions in Different Cases. The court held that inherent power under Section 482 CrPC can be invoked to direct sentences to run concurrently to secure ends of justice, even if trial courts did not specify concurrency.

16 Dec 2016

The judgment involves two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking orders to direct that subs...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Interim Injunction Granted to Protect Possession Pending Trial. Agreement of Sale for Rs.10.75 Crore with Part Payment of Rs.3.25 Crore — Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Injunction Without Considering Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience.

23 Nov 2024

The appeal arises from an order dated 01.06.2022 passed by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru, rejecting I.A.N...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Institutional Preference in Post Graduate Medical Admissions — NEET Does Not Abrogate University-Wise Reservation. Gujarat University Rules Providing Preference to Its Own Graduates Held Valid Under Existing Precedents.

4 Oct 2019

The case involves a challenge to the policy of 'Institutional Preference' for admission to Post Graduate Medical Courses, specifically under the rules...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of APMC as Previous Consultation with State Agricultural Marketing Board Not Validly Conducted. The requirement of 'previous consultation' under Section 45(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 was not satisfied as the consultation was held only with the Board's office bearers instead of the full Board.

9 Apr 2013

Fifteen directors of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Amravati, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Income Tax Act Section 80-IB(10) Cases – Clause (d) Commercial Area Limit Not Applicable to Projects Approved Before 31 March 2005. Housing Projects Approved Pre-2005 Held Entitled to Deduction Under Section 80-IB(10) Even if Commercial Area Exceeds 5% or 2000 Sq Ft, Per Ratio in CIT v. Brahma Associates.

19 Sep 2014

These two income tax appeals were filed by the Revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the orders of the Income Tax Appell...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Sanction. Decoy Trap Found Vitiated as Panch Witnesses Were Police Employees and Sanction for Prosecution Was Not Obtained Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

5 Feb 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Sheriff's Poundage Payable on Settlement Amounts in Admiralty Suits — Admiralty Jurisdiction — Sheriff's Fees — Table of Fees under Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 — Court ruled that poundage is payable on the amount for which the vessel is released, including settlement sums, and not merely on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest, and that the Sheriff is entitled to poundage even if the suit is settled before actual sale, as the Sheriff's services in effecting arrest and maintaining custody are rendered.

17 Jan 2018

The Bombay High Court addressed two unrelated admiralty suits tagged together to decide a common issue regarding the payment of poundage to the Sherif...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Conflicting Precedents on Procedural Mandates for No Confidence Motions Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Reference to Larger Bench Examines Whether Formal Motion and Seconding Requirement Under Rule 17 of Meeting Rules is Mandatory or Directory.

9 Oct 2014

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from a no confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Theur, Pune. The appellant, wh...

82 83 84 85 86

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)