Search Results for "Dispute Application"

19371 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19371 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Writ Petition, Directs Execution of Section 14 SARFAESI Order Despite Pending Civil Suit. Executive Magistrate Cannot Refuse Possession on Ground of Civil Suit; Role Under Section 14 is Ministerial.

The Petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, a banking company, had sanctioned a housing loan to Dipak Digambar Naik and Aruna Naik (co-borrowers) in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment in Partition Suit After Trial Commenced. Amendment to Add Properties and Parties Allowed as Not Changing Nature of Suit and Due Diligence Found.

The petitioners, original defendants in Special Civil Suit No. 160 of 2012, challenged orders dated 13/03/2019 allowing two applications (exhibit no. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail Granted Under Section 437(6) CrPC for Non-Completion of Trial Within 60 Days of Charge Framing. The court held that the Magistrate failed to consider the prosecution's application for further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC, which justified the delay in trial.

The applicant, UT Worldwide India Pvt. Ltd., filed five criminal applications seeking cancellation of bail granted to respondent no. 2 (the accused) b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Plaint in Eviction Suit. Amendment to Clarify Property Description Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as No Prejudice Caused to Tenant.

The petitioner, M/s K.T. Kubal & Company, was a tenant in a building owned by the respondent, Mujibur Rehman Haji Israr Alam Siddiqui. The respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Right of Way Order Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act Due to Bar of Res Judicata and Lack of Jurisdiction. Dismissal of First Application for Default Operates as Final Order Barring Second Application Under Section 5 of Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906.

The petitioner, Jayant Namdeorao Gohad, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: (1) the ...