Search Results for "valuation date"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "valuation date"

1752 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1752 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows Acquiring Body's Appeal and Dismisses Landowners' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 3,50,000 per Hectare with 10% Development Deduction. The court upheld the Reference Court's valuation but reduced the development deduction from 20% to 10%, balancing the interests of the acquiring body and the landowners.

20 Jul 2010

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment and award dated 10th September 2003 passed by the Additional District Judge at Mapusa in ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Landowner's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation and Allows State's Appeal Restoring Original Award. Market Value of Land Acquired for Fire Station Determined at Rs.70 per sqm Based on Comparable Sales and Development Potential.

12 Aug 2011

The case involves two appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding. The land belonging to the applicants (appellants in FA 225/2003) was acquire...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Official Liquidator's Decision to Sell Company Assets as a Going Concern. Court Upholds Liquidator's Discretion Under Companies Act, 1956 to Reject Private Offers and Proceed with Public Auction for Maximizing Value.

19 Oct 2011

The case involves a Company Appeal filed by the legal heirs of Umashankar Saraf and other family members against the Official Liquidator of M/s. Rai B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition in Civil Suit for Injunction — Dispute Over Agricultural Land Sale Deed Validity. Court Holds That a Party Cannot Be Compelled to Pay Court Fees on a Higher Valuation When the Suit Is for Permanent Injunction and the Plaintiff Has Not Sought Declaration of Title.

6 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Suresh Sahebrao Tawale, was the original defendant No.4 in a civil suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) for permanent i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Enforcement of Interim Arbitral Award Pending Section 34 Challenge. Court holds that once a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is filed within time, the arbitral award does not become enforceable until the expiry of the limitation period or disposal of the petition, and interim relief can be granted to preserve the subject matter.

18 Oct 2012

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the petitioners in an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds single judge's refusal to set aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to challenge.

22 Feb 2005

The Union of India (appellant) had invited tenders for construction work, and Moti Enterprises (respondent) was the successful tenderer. The contract ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. yard Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Development Potential. Court Held That Acquired Land Had Building Potential and Was in a Developing Area, Warranting Higher Compensation.

13 Jun 2005

The case pertains to a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by the claimants (owners of the acquired land) seeking enha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Pre-emptive Purchase Order Under Section 269UD(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Comparable Sale Instance and Failure to Establish 15% Undervaluation. The Appropriate Authority's reliance on a non-comparable sale instance and incorrect computation of fair market value rendered the order unsustainable.

25 Nov 2005

The petitioners, owners of an open plot of land in Pune, challenged an order dated February 23, 1995, passed by the Appropriate Authority under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellant's claim of tenancy and adverse possession rejected as not proved.

24 Jun 2013

The case involves a second appeal filed by Dhondiba Namdeorao Bhosale, original defendant No.6, against the judgment and decree passed by the District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Acquisition Order Under Income Tax Act for Non-Application of Mind. Appropriate Authority Failed to Consider Comparable Sales in Same Building, Rendering Order Under Section 269UD(1) Invalid.

9 Oct 2006

The petitioners, owners of a flat in Mumbai, entered into an agreement to sell the flat for Rs. 19 lakhs and filed Form 37-I under Chapter XX-C of the...

81 82 83 84 85

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)