Search Results for "seizure and recovery"

1853 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1853 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines MCD's Recovery Notices Against MEPIDL for Territorial Overreach. Cross-Petitions on Attachment of Assets Outside Delhi Under DMC Act, 1957.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 28th September 2017 between MEP Infrastructure Developers Limited (MEPIDL), a Mumbai-based enterprise, and the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eye Witness Testimony and Doubtful Recovery of Weapon. Bitter Gourd Creeper Dispute Leads to Life Imprisonment Reversed as Court Finds Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Ashok Chindha Birhade, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his neighbour Devidas, arising from a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Laxman alias Laxmayya Gangaram Zinna, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai for the offence punishable under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeals in Murder and Attempt to Murder Case, Upholding Conviction Under IPC Sections 302, 307, and 323 with Common Intention. Conviction Based on Eye-Witness Testimony and Postmortem Evidence, with Alibi Defence Rejected Due to Insufficient Proof.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard two criminal appeals filed by appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 395, 397 IPC. The Court Examines the Identification of Accused in a Dacoity Case Where No Test Identification Parade Was Conducted.

Background: This criminal appeal arose from a judgment of the IIIrd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No. 63 of 2004, convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Arson Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 427 and 436 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Suyash Rajiv Mulukh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 427 (mischief causing damage)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to three appeals arising from a sessions case where two accused (Anand Roopchand Gajbhiye and Sandeep Namdeo Nimhan) were convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Radheshyam Dashrath Naitam, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.433/2015 for the murder of Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 392 IPC set aside as sole testimony of complainant was not corroborated by independent witnesses and recovery of stolen property was doubtful.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Mohan @ Mouneshi, against the judgment of the II Additional District and Sessi...