Search Results for "civil dispute versus criminal"

2411 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2411 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Conspiracy and Murder of Martandgouda under Sections 302, 120-B, 201, 506 read with Section 34 IPC.

The case pertains to the murder of Martandgouda, who went missing on 11.12.2011. A missing complaint was lodged by his son on 16.12.2011, leading to r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court restored conviction under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of two cheques of Rs.1 lakh each.

The appellant, M/s Radhesham Laxminarayan and Co., a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Slum Rehabilitation Tenement Dispute. Court holds that Trial Court erred in not considering balance of convenience and irreparable loss while rejecting injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The appellants, Fayzan Khan, Devendra Mishra, Firoz Ismail Khan, and Rajesh Kanojiya, filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Dindoshi seeking a decla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Rejecting Secondary Evidence Application in Specific Performance Suit. Trial Court Directed to Permit Plaintiffs to Lead Evidence of Lost Agreement to Sell Upon Establishing Foundational Facts Under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the original plaintiffs against an order of the trial court rejecting t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...