Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1639 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1639 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

(SLP (C) No.28644 of 2019)

Background: The case involves a service dispute where an Executive Engineer (Civil) with the North Delhi Municipal Corporation was dismissed from serv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Seeking Reassessment of Customs Duty Due to Typographical Error in Customs Tariff Heading. Petitioner's Inadvertent Error in Declaring CTH 85176990 Instead of 85176930 for Routers Entitles Correction Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Dimension Data India Private Ltd., an importer, filed five Bills of Entry between 15.03.2019 and 25.04.2019 for importing 48 units of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Orders in Customs Duty Under-Invoicing Case. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Settlement Application Upheld as Proper Exercise of Discretion Under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, M/s Paul Industries, imported electronic goods during 1995-96 and was issued a show cause notice on 11th June 1999 by the Directorate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Revision of GST TRAN-1 to Claim Transitional Credit Due to Technical Glitch. Petitioner permitted to file revised FORM GST TRAN-1 under Section 140(8) of CGST Act, 2017 to correct inadvertent error in transferring credit to branch.

The petitioner, M/S Atria Convergence Technologies Ltd, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Central Goods and Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Penalty Case for Wrongful DTAA Claim — No Concealment Found. Assessee's Bonafide Belief That India-China DTAA Applied to Hong Kong Based on Official Document Precludes Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The revenue appealed against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which set aside the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) ...