Search Results for "Building Plan Sanction"

883 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 883 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Entry Tax Act — State Legislature Competent to Levy Entry Tax on Goods Imported from Outside State. Levy of Entry Tax Under Entry 52 List II Not Repugnant to Central Sales Tax Act and Is a Reasonable Restriction Under Article 304(b).

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Housing Board Dispute — Unauthorized Construction Not Ipso Facto Nuisance but Concurrent Findings Upheld. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Despite Section 71 Bar of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 as Suit Pertains to Private Rights.

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendant No.1, Sau. Smita Mohod, against concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Trial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Endorsement on Building Construction — Petitioner Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 321 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Shri Shrishail S/o Gangappa Bolannawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals Against Land Acquisition for Sir M. Visveswaraya Layout; Upholds Single Judge's Order. The appeals challenged acquisition notifications under Sections 17(1) and 19(1) of the BDA Act, 1976, alleging arbitrary exclusion and violation of constitutional rights.

This matter concerns four writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated June 6, 2006, of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Prospective Levy of Land Development Charges Under Section 124A of MRTP Act, 1966 — No Retrospective Recovery for Pre-1992 Permissions. Rain Harvesting Charges and Audit Objections Also Raised.

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench heard a public interest litigation (Writ Petition No.4264/2009) concerning three issues: levy and recovery of la...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Whether Bihar Government Scheme Can Impose Housing Obligation on Employer in Industrial Dispute. The Industrial Tribunal and Labour Appellate Tribunal Had Upheld the Demand for Quarters, Directing Construction of 15 Units Under the Scheme.

The case arose from an industrial dispute between The Patna Electric Supply Co., Ltd. and its Workers’ Union regarding the demand for housing quarte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation of Delhi's Petition Seeking Mandamus Against State of Maharashtra to Execute Distress Warrants. Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Has No Extra-Territorial Application, Hence No Duty on Maharashtra Authorities.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), a statutory body under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, filed a writ petition in the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RBI Moratorium on Urban Co-operative Bank. RBI Directions Under Section 35A of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 Are Binding and Not Subject to Challenge Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The case involves three writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the directions issued by the Reserve Bank of Indi...