Supreme Court Examines Whether Bihar Government Scheme Can Impose Housing Obligation on Employer in Industrial Dispute. The Industrial Tribunal and Labour Appellate Tribunal Had Upheld the Demand for Quarters, Directing Construction of 15 Units Under the Scheme.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arose from an industrial dispute between The Patna Electric Supply Co., Ltd. and its Workers’ Union regarding the demand for housing quarters for employees. The Union demanded that the company provide quarters in accordance with a scheme formulated by the Bihar Government. The scheme, prepared by the Industrial Housing sub-Committee and sanctioned by the Bihar Central (Standing) Labour Advisory Board, imposed primary responsibility on employers for housing industrial labour and offered financial assistance from the State Government by way of a loan covering 50% of capital, repayable in 25 annual instalments. The company resisted the demand, arguing that the State, not the employer, was primarily responsible for providing quarters and that it was financially incapable of undertaking the construction. The Industrial Tribunal upheld the Union’s claim and directed the company to start construction of at least 15 quarters as specified by the scheme within one year. On appeal, the Labour Appellate Tribunal confirmed the award, holding that the Government scheme was binding on the company. The company then appealed to the Supreme Court, contending that the scheme was not obligatory and could not impose a term of employment. The Union argued that the scheme had materially altered the existing rule of industrial adjudication in Bihar and had created a moral obligation on the employer. The Supreme Court examined the validity of the award based on the Government scheme and its binding effect on the employer.

Headnote

A) Labour Law - Housing Facilities for Workmen - Obligation of Employer under Government Scheme - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - The Industrial Tribunal directed the company to construct 15 quarters as per the Bihar Government Scheme, and the Labour Appellate Tribunal upheld the award, holding the scheme binding. The Supreme Court considered whether the scheme could validly impose such an obligation, altering the existing norms of industrial adjudication.

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the award based on the Bihar Government Scheme is valid and whether the scheme can impose an obligation on the employer to construct quarters for workmen.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Validity of award based on government scheme for housing industrial labour
  • binding nature of such scheme on employers
  • tribunal's power to direct construction of quarters
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1959 LawText (SC) (04) 18

1959-04-23

Gajendragadkar, P.B., Sinha, Bhuvneshwar P., Wanchoo, K.N.

1959 AIR 1035, 1959 SCR Supl. (2) 761

The Patna Electric Supply Co., Ltd., Patna

The Patna Electric Supply Workers’ Union

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Industrial dispute regarding demand for housing quarters for employees.

Remedy Sought

The Workers’ Union sought a direction that the company provide quarters to its employees as per the Bihar Government Scheme and undertake immediate construction.

Filing Reason

The company had not provided quarters to employees, leading to the demand.

Previous Decisions

The Industrial Tribunal directed the company to construct at least 15 quarters as per the scheme within a year. The Labour Appellate Tribunal upheld the award, holding the scheme binding.

Issues

Whether the award based on the Bihar Government Scheme is valid. Whether the Government scheme can impose an obligation on the employer to construct quarters. Whether the scheme can be treated as altering the rule of industrial adjudication.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant contended that the scheme was not obligatory and could not impose a term of employment on the workmen. Respondent argued that the scheme had materially altered the rule followed by industrial adjudication in Bihar and had imposed a moral obligation on the company.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal upheld the Union’s claim and directed the company to start construction of at least 15 quarters, as specified by the Government scheme, within a year. The Labour Appellate Tribunal, on appeal, held that the Government scheme was binding on the company and upheld the award. It imposed on the employers the responsibility for housing industrial labour and provided for financial assistance to the employers by the State Government to the extent Of 50% of ’the capital required, by way of loan repayable in 25 annual instalments, recoverable, on default, from the properties mortgaged for the loan or the assets of the debtor.

Procedural History

The dispute was referred to the Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal passed an award directing the company to start construction of at least 15 quarters as per the Bihar Government Scheme within a year. On appeal, the Labour Appellate Tribunal upheld the award, holding the scheme binding on the company. The company then appealed to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Examines Whether Bihar Government Scheme Can Impose Housing Obligation on Employer in Industrial Dispute. The Industrial Tribunal and Labour Appellate Tribunal Had Upheld the Demand for Quarters, Directing Construction of 15 Units Under...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff in Commercial Suit for Dishonour of Cheque — Bank's Defence of Missing Signature on Reverse of Cheque Rejected as Not Triable Issue. The court held that under the Negotiable Instrument...