Search Results for "Article 227 writ jurisdiction"

3509 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3509 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Three Writ Petitions Challenging Government Orders and Lokayukta Charge Memoes in Basava Vasati Housing Scheme Scam Case. Court Examines Legality of Disciplinary Proceedings Under Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957 and Lokayukta Act, 1984.

Three writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka by retired engineers of Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Setting Aside of Election for Non-Compliance with Section 9A of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. Failure to File Election Expenses Within Prescribed Period Renders Candidature Invalid and Election Void.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Shaikh Shaifque, the returned candidate from Ward No.23B of Malegaon Municipal Corporation, challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Revision Order Alleging Excess of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Court Examines Whether Stamp Duty Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 is Payable on Built-Up Area When Sale Deed Conveys Only Undivided Land Share.

The litigation arose out of a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) between Prestige Estates Projects Limited (developer) and United Breweries (Holdings) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Property Tax Pre-Deposit Condition for Appeal Entertainment Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Pre-deposit under Section 217(2)(d) is mandatory for entertaining appeal, and interim relief cannot be granted without compliance.

The petitioners, Fleet Fastners Private Limited and another, challenged two orders: (1) an order dated 13 July 2011 by the Municipal Corporation of Gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition, Sets Aside Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Restoration in Specific Performance Suit. Defendant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Despite Knowledge of Proceedings.

The petitioner, Hemant Ganeshprasad Jaiswal, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 6.2.2006 against the respondent, Mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Deletion of Issues and Rejection of Section 151 Application. Court holds that Order XIV Rule 5 CPC allows deletion of issues at any stage and Section 151 CPC cannot be used to circumvent specific provisions like Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The case involves a property dispute over CB-97, Naraina Village, Delhi Cantt. The appellants (defendants in the suit) challenged two orders of the De...