Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Act is Discriminatory, Unconstitutional and Violative of Constitutional Rights.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD
Admin
2026-09-15 06:05:03
  • 131
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011 (Karnataka Act No.27 of 2011) is discriminatory, violative of constitutional rights and unconstitutional

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (11) 10

WRIT PETITION Nos.64805-64868 OF 2011 (GM-R/C) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION Nos.65648-65680 OF 2011 (GM-R/C) WRIT PETITION Nos.72157 OF 2012 AND 80796-80822 OF 2013 (GM-R/C) WRIT PETITION No.65539 OF 2012 (GM-R/C)

2015-11-17

Anand Byrareddy, S. Sujatha

Subramanya Jois, M.N.Rao, A.P.Hegde Janmane, C.S.Patil

Shri Maha Ganapati Shankara Devasthana, Sirsi and others

State of Karnataka and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Constitutional challenge to a state amendment act

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seek to declare the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011 as discriminatory, violative of constitutional rights, unconstitutional and strike down the same in its entirety

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011:
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
discriminatory violative of constitutional rights unconstitutional writ petition charitable endowments amendment act constitutional validity Karnataka Act No.27 of 2011 Hindu Religious Institutions

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging MMRDA’s Demand for Additional Premium under Lease Deed — Interpretation of Time Extension Clauses and Effect of Interim Court Orders on Construction Deadlines 2026-09-17 02:44:56
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court Conviction in Murder Case Stemming from Dog Bark Incident. Court Examines Whether Accused Were Aggressors and Whether FIR Statement of Co-Accused Could Be Used to Infer Motive Under Indian Evidence Act, 1... 2026-09-17 02:44:41
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?