APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015
8 Mar 2016The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahi...
Search Results for "same pay scale"
2534 result(s) found
Found 2534 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Pronounces Order in Writ Petition No.24266 of 2021 Challenging Criminal Proceedings Against Pontiff. Court Considered Whether Delay, Cognizance Validity, and Non-Application of Mind Vitiate Proceedings Under Section 204 Cr.P.C.
7 Mar 2025The writ petition was filed by the pontiff of Shree Samsthana Gokarna Shree Ramachandrapura Math seeking to quash criminal proceedings in C.C.No.26533...
- 15
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Assured Career Progression Scheme Case Due to Employee's Refusal of Regular Promotion. Financial Upgradation Under ACP Scheme is Conditional on No Regular Promotion Being Availed, and Refusal Disqualifies Employee as Per Condition 5.1 of Office Memorandum Dated 9.8.1999.
3 Jan 2022The dispute involved Central Government employees appointed as Senior Translators (Hindi) who were offered promotion to Translation Officer (Hindi) bu...
- 468
High Court
Karnataka High Court Refers Questions on Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Temples to Full Bench. Division Bench Finds Arguable Questions Whether Temple is 'Commercial Establishment' Under Karnataka Shops Act and Whether Prior Precedent on Temple Employee's Gratuity is Correct.
1 Aug 2019The dispute arose when a former employee of Shri Mookambika Temple, Kollur, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 after his superan...
- 68
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Holds that Taking Insurance Policy for Commercial Premises is for Commercial Purpose, Excluding Complainant from Definition of 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court ruled that a commercial entity taking fire insurance policy for its business premises is not a 'consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Act, as the policy is taken for commercial purpose.
13 Apr 2023The present appeals by special leave assail the judgment and order dated 3rd December, 2004 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Na...
- 172
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice for Royalty on Steatite Extraction in Violation of Affidavit Condition — Petitioner's Use of Mineral for Decorative Blocks Not Proved to Be for Cottage Industry. Affidavit Undertaking Not Incorporated in Lease Deed Cannot Be Enforced as Condition of Lease.
14 Aug 2014The petitioner, S.K. Suresh, held a quarry lease for steatite (a minor mineral) granted on 10-11-2010 under the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rul...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.
21 Feb 2011The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...
- 92
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Confirmation of Death Sentence and Appeals in Murder Case. The Court Examined Whether the Circumstantial Evidence, Including Last Seen, Recovery, and CDRs, Proved the Guilt of the Accused Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 201 of Indian Penal Code.
21 Jan 2014The matter arose out of the disappearance and death of Dhanshree Ramteke, a student, on 14/8/2012. She left home for tuition at 6.30 p.m. on her moped...
- 125
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Employee in Education Service Dispute Due to Irregular Promotion. Promotion to Office Superintendent Found Invalid Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.
1 Apr 2015The petitioner, Rajendra Waman Rajemane, was appointed as a Junior Clerk in June 1992 at Kiraksal High School, run by respondent No.1, Phaltan Educati...
- 175
High Court
Karnataka High Court Upholds Executing Court’s Dismissal of Obstruction Applications Filed Under Order 21 Rule 97 and 99 CPC. Decree for Eviction Executed; Objectors Failed to Prove Possession at Time of Delivery.
5 Dec 2013The revision petitions arose from the execution of eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court in three eviction petitions filed by the decree h...
- 80
