Search Results for "notice under section 138"

1911 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1911 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Passes Order on Interim Plea Over Yes Bank Management Rights Claimed by Heirs of Ashok Kapur. Core Issue Involves Interpretation of Articles of Association Regarding Heritability of Co-founder's Defined Privileges Following His Death in 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks.

The judgment deals with a Notice of Motion taken out by the legal heirs of late Ashok Kapur, co-founder of Yes Bank, who perished in the November 2008...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies when cheque and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused to prove defence.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the complainant, Sukhalal Kumar, against the acquittal of the accused, Prakash B. Borkar, under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Service of notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 must be at the correct address; notice sent to a closed office address is invalid.

The petitioners, Mukeshbhai Balabhai Patel and his wife Ranjanben, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court restored conviction under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of two cheques of Rs.1 lakh each.

The appellant, M/s Radhesham Laxminarayan and Co., a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Time-Barred Debt. Cheque Issued for Debt Beyond Limitation Period Not Legally Enforceable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, an accused convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed a criminal revision application before the High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SECOND APPEAL NO. 148 OF 2016

The dispute centered on rights to perform pooja and collect offerings at Goddess Shree Rupa Bhavani Temple in Solapur, registered as a public trust. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Improper Rejection of Secondary Evidence. Court holds that trial court erred in rejecting application to lead secondary evidence of cheque and dishonour memo when originals were lost, and remands case for fresh trial.

The appellant, Maharashtra State Seeds Corporation Limited, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the re...