Search Results for "notice under CPC"

3667 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3667 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Special Court at Bombay Delivers Judgment in Securities Fraud Case — Accused Face Charges Under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act for Cheating, Forgery, and Criminal Conspiracy

This criminal case arises from the 1992 securities scam, which severely impacted India's economy. The prosecution alleged that multiple accused person...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Revenue Appeal on Deletion of Additions for Bogus Transportation, Illegal Mining, and Helicopter Expenses. The Court Examines Whether the ITAT's Deletions Were Perverse and Whether Cross-Examination Rights Were Adequately Protected Under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal before the Karnataka High Court arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bengaluru, which partly allowed the assess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Land Acquisition Reference Dismissed for Default Despite Merits Decision. Order IX Rule 9 CPC Application Maintainable When Reference Court Decides Case on Merits in Absence of Applicant.

The petitioner, Arvind Vyankatrao Tarar, was the original applicant in Land Acquisition Case No. 19 of 2001 pending before the Reference Court under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Order Allowing DNA Test Under Order XXVI Rule 10A CPC in Partition Suit. Petition Raises Questions of Right to Privacy Under Article 21 and Applicability of Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the third defendant in a partition suit, O.S. No. 89 of 2016, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence. Court holds that Order 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to fill gaps in evidence or to allow a party to adduce additional evidence after closure of evidence.

The petitioners, who are defendants in a partition suit, filed a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challe...