Search Results for "Collector permission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Collector permission"

1825 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1825 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member for Being Servant of Agricultural Produce Market Committee. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Held to be a Local Authority Under Section 14(1)(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, and Section 3(31) of General Clauses Act, 1897.

22 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Babasaheb Devram Sathe, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Jalgaon Budruk, in 2010 and also functioned as Sarpanch. The fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme — Petitioner Failed to Establish Right to Retain Tenement After Ceasing to Be Eligible Slum Dweller.

22 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Harshaben Madhu, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 07/02/2...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Reforms Tribunal Order in Land Grant Case — Petitioners' Father Was Granted Land Under Rule 43(5) of Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969, and the Land Was Not Granted Under the Land Reforms Act. The Assistant Commissioner and Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under Sections 79A and 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

7 Jan 2020

The petitioners, legal representatives of late D. Ramanatha Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Fragmentation Act Case — Preferential Right of Contiguous Land Owner Upheld. Sale of Fragmented Land to Non-Contiguous Purchaser Violates Section 7 of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.

6 Dec 2018

The appellant, Vilas Shivmurti Munde, filed a second appeal against the dismissal of his suit for declaration and injunction. The suit sought to decla...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Release of Seized Gold Due to Non-Issuance of Notice Under Section 124 of Customs Act, 1962 Within Prescribed Period Under Section 110(2). The court held that continued seizure beyond six months without notice under Section 124 is illegal and directed release of gold.

22 Apr 2015

The petitioner, K. Abdulla Kunhi Abdul Rahaman, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnatak...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Mandatory Lis Pendens Entry in 7/12 Extracts Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Government Resolution Not Recording Lis Pendens Upheld as No Express Statutory Provision Mandates Such Entry.

17 Jul 2018

The two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court raised a common issue concerning the mandatory recording of lis pendens entries in land records, s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Waqf Board Notice on Land Exchange — Exchange of Waqf Property Allegedly Without Required Sanction Under Section 32(2)(j) of Waqf Act, 1995. Court Examines Whether Notice Was Final Decision or Show-Cause, and Whether Exchange Valid Despite Internal Board Procedural Issues.

9 Oct 2017

The petitioners, a partnership firm and its partner, challenged a notice issued by the Chief Executive Officer of the Maharashtra State Board of Waqfs...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's Order of Remand in Agricultural Tenancy Cases as Being Unwarranted When No Evidence of Tenancy Existed. The Court Holds That Remand for Fresh Enquiry is Impermissible Under Principles Analogous to Order XLI Rules 23 and 23A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, When the Revisional Authority Concludes That There Is No Material to Prove the Claim of Tenancy Under Section 70(b) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

1 Nov 2012

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with 128 writ petitions filed by landowners challenging a common order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribuna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Caste Certificate Invalidation Under Maharashtra Act 23 of 2001. Petitioner Raises Issues of Committee Constitution and Affinity Test Inadequacy Against Scrutiny Committee Order.

11 Nov 2011

The matter involved a challenge to the Caste Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the petitioner's claim to belong to the Halba Scheduled Tribe und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Planning Authority Can Compel Landowner to Accept Transferable Development Rights Instead of Monetary Compensation Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The Division Bench Examines the Interplay of Sections 126 and 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Where a Landowner Served a Purchase Notice After Reservation Not Acquired Within Ten Years and the Planning Authority Offered TDR as Compensation.

16 Sep 2021

The petitioner, a landowner, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that her land reserved in the Developme...

80 81 82 83 84

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)