Search Results for "Article 120"

1872 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1872 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Disposes of Multiple Criminal Appeals Challenging Conviction and State’s Enhancement Plea in Double Murder Case. Convictions Under Sections 304 Part I, 147, 148, 149 IPC Arising from Land Boundary Dispute Are Examined and Partly Allowed.

The High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, delivered a common oral judgment disposing of four criminal appeals: three filed by convi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeals Filed by 23 Accused Convicted for Murder, Rioting, and Damaging Property Under IPC and Bombay Police Act. Trial Court Convicted Accused for Offences Including Section 302 r/w 149 IPC, Stemming from Inter-Community Political Violence in Village Talaghar.

These four criminal appeals, heard together by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, arise from Sessions Case No.79 of 2004 decided by the Additiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Lack of Compelling Necessity for Detaining Person Already in Custody. Detaining Authority Failed to Provide Cogent Material Showing Likelihood of Detenu's Release on Bail, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

Background: The case involves a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a preventive detention order passed against the petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Occupier-Cum-Manager for Operating Tobacco Processing Unit Without Licence Under Factories Act. Moistening, Stripping, and Packing of Tobacco Leaves Held to Be Manufacturing Process; Persons Employed Through Agency Deemed Workers Under Section 2(1).

The case arose from a prosecution under the Factories Act, 1948, against the appellant, V. P. Gopala Rao, who was the occupier-cum-manager of a tobacc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petitions Challenging Magistrate's Order and FIR in Share Fraud Complaint Under IPC and CrPC. Petitioners Raised Malafide Complaint, Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction, and Non-compliance with Priyanka Srivastava Affidavit Requirement.

The Bombay High Court was considering two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Partnership Investment — Complaint Not Maintainable Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as Complainant Was a Partner and Transaction Was Commercial. Partner Cannot Be a Consumer; Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner Not Liable in Consumer Forum.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the legal heirs of a deceased partner against the concurrent orders of the consumer fora directing them ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Suspension of Life Sentence in Murder Case — Bail Granted Without Proper Application of Mind. High Court Failed to Consider Seriousness of Offence and Prima Facie Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Omprakash Sahni, brother of the deceased Manish Kumar, filed appeals against a common order of the Patna High Court suspending the life...