Search Results for "temporary employment"

1176 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1176 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes State Government's Cancellation of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Approvals and Directs Fresh Hearing. Inconsistencies Between Government Directives and SRA Circular Were Not Established, and Scheme Was Permitted Under New Housing Policy of 2007.

The petitioner, a developer, submitted a proposal for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme which was in the nature of a Township Development Scheme for approx...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Employer's Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Under Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS). Resignation Submitted Under MVRS Was Unconditional and Could Not Be Withdrawn After Acceptance, as Per Scheme Terms Under Clause 5.1.

The dispute arose from the respondent's resignation under the Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS) introduced by the appellants, a public secto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seniority List in Junior Assistant Cadre Due to Incorrect Placement of Hyderabad-Karnataka Region Appointees. Seniority Must Be Based on Date of Appointment, Not Reservation Status.

The petitioner, Kallappa Gonnagar, a Junior Assistant in the O&M Division of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL), challenged the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claims of Resigned Judicial Officers in Service Law Dispute. Resignation Does Not Forfeit Statutory Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Judicial Officers with Over 12 Years of Service.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by former judicial officers of the Maharashtra State Judicial Service. The petitioners, Jeevan Kashinat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order for Property Linked to Narcotics Trafficking. Burden of Proof Under Section 7 SAFEMA Not Discharged by Claimant.

The petitioner, Imperial Exim (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 31 March 2011 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New ...