Search Results for "share purchase"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "share purchase"

1720 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1720 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reviews Competence of Execution Court to Entertain Section 47 CPC Objections to International Arbitral Award Allegedly Tainted by Fraud; High Court's Dismissal of Objections Questioned. Public Sector Undertaking Appellant Contended That Award Procured Through Collusion of Own Officers with Decree-Holder Is Void Ab Initio, but Executing Court Found No Established Finding of Fraud.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a Long Term Agreement dated 07.03.2007 between MMTC Limited (a Public Sector Undertaking) and Anglo American Metallurgical Coal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines High Court's Dismissal of Objections Under Section 47 CPC in Enforcement of Arbitral Award. Appeal Arises from Long-Term Coal Supply Agreement Dispute Involving Fraud Allegations and Scope of Section 47.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a Long Term Agreement dated 07.03.2007 between MMTC Limited (appellant) and Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pvt. Limited (res...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Interim Motions in Suit by Foreign Trustees for Recovery of Assets Allegedly Concealed in India. The Court Examines Whether Plaintiffs Have Made Out Prima Facie Case for Disclosure and Deposit Orders Based on US Bankruptcy Court Findings.

8 Dec 2005

The suit was filed by ITC Ltd., acting as trustees in bankruptcy of Suresh Chitalia, Devang Chitalia, EST Fibres Inc., and Lokman Establishment, to re...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Subsequent Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale Held Sham and Not Intended to Be Acted Upon. Evidence Act Sections 91 and 92 Do Not Bar Proof of Sham Transaction; Subsequent Purchasers Are Bona Fide Purchasers Without Notice.

9 Jul 2024

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 7th December 1981 executed by the first defendant in favour of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Purchaser Against High Court Decision That Compromise Decree Does Not Bind Coparceners. Property Reacquired by Coparceners Through Court Decree Retains Joint Family Character, Requiring Consent of All Coparceners for Valid Compromise Under Hindu Law.

1 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the High Court's judgment which declared that a compromise decree dated 25 March 1976, entered into betw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal by Third Parties in Suit for Injunction and Declaration — Appellants Not Bound by Consent Decree as They Were Not Parties to Original Suit. Consent decree cannot be enforced against persons who were not parties to the suit, as it does not bind third parties under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

13 Jan 2010

The present second appeal arises from a dispute concerning a consent decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No. 22 of 1983. The appellants, Bhivsan Kisan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Remand Order in Property Suit — Trial Court's Judgment Set Aside for Failure to Frame Issues and Consider Evidence. Lower Appellate Court's Remand Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power to Prevent Failure of Justice.

27 Oct 2010

The case involves a property dispute over land Survey No. 50 admeasuring 26 acres 4 gunthas situated at village Asadullabag. The original plaintiff, K...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Dismissal of Execution Objection — Lower Appellate Court Failed to Consider Merits of Objection Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. The court held that the appellate court must consider the substance of the objection regarding tenancy rights and joint possession, not dismiss it on technical grounds.

23 Nov 2010

The petitioners, Shripati Ganpati Jadhav and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the District Judge, P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summons for Judgment in Summary Suit for Recovery of Project Management Fees. Agreement for Development of Property by Family Members Not a Commercial Transaction Entitling Summary Procedure Under Order 37 CPC.

19 Jul 2011

The plaintiff, Satchi Development Company Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for recovery of ₹3,70...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summons for Judgment in Summary Suit for Recovery of Project Expenses Due to Triable Issues. Agreement for Project Management and Development between Family Members Raises Questions of Authority, Consideration, and Entitlement to Reimbursement.

19 Jul 2011

The plaintiff, Satchi Development Company Pvt. Ltd., filed a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 3,70,20,410 with future interest against defendant No.1,...

79 80 81 82 83

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)