Search Results for "residential order"

3549 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3549 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Human Rights Commission Order Directing Allotment of Flat by MHADA. Commission lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate proprietary rights under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), a statutory authority for housing development in Maharashtra, challenged a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Cancellation of Land Allotment After 13 Years — Delay Unreasonable Despite No Limitation Prescribed Under UPZALR Act. Allottees Who Constructed Houses and Resided for 13 Years Have Legitimate Expectation; Suo Moto Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Period.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had upheld the cancellation of land allotment to the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Tender Cancellation as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Petitioner's Highest Bid Accepted After 21 Months, Cancellation Without Justification Violates Article 14.

The petitioner, Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP, participated in an e-auction conducted by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers BDA's Appeal Against Quashing of Land Acquisition Notifications Under Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976. Case Involves Dispute Over Inclusion of 5 Acres Not in Preliminary Notification and Offer of 40% Developed Land as Compensation.

The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) initiated acquisition proceedings for 4,043 acres 27 guntas of land to form the Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in TADA Case Due to Invalid Sanction — Prior Sanction Under Section 20A(2) TADA Must Show Application of Mind. The Designated Court's finding of non-application of mind in sanction order was upheld, and the prosecution could not proceed under TADA.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of three respondents by the Designated Judge, Jamnagar, in Special TADA Case Nos.3/1994, 3/1997, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Challenging Illegal Construction by Builder with Political Connections. Court Quashes Regularisation Orders and Directs Demolition of Unauthorised Structures in Old Goa.

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the construction of buildings by Respo...