Search Results for "owner definition"

1845 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1845 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Cannot Claim Against Himself. Claim by Mother of Deceased Maintainable as She is a Legal Representative Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the insurance company under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 23.10.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Minor Injured in Road Accident — Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Insurer Held Liable to Pay and Recover from Owner Due to Driver Without Valid License.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 27.11.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hiriyur, in MVC No.78/2009. The claimant, D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Financier in Motor Vehicle Tax Default Case — Financier Not Liable for Tax Default of Borrower Under Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957. Hypothecation Does Not Confer Possession or Control, Hence No Prima Facie Case Against Financier.

The petitioner, M/s. Shriram Investments Ltd. (now amalgamated with Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.), was a financier for a commercial vehicle bear...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Determines Reference on Maintainability of Section 18 Reference Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After 2013 Act Came into Force. Key Issue Involves Whether Landowners Can Seek Enhancement Under Old Act When Award Passed After Commencement of 2013 Act.

Background: The matter arose from a land acquisition proceeding initiated by the Pune Municipal Corporation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. A no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals Against Land Acquisition for Sir M. Visveswaraya Layout; Upholds Single Judge's Order. The appeals challenged acquisition notifications under Sections 17(1) and 19(1) of the BDA Act, 1976, alleging arbitrary exclusion and violation of constitutional rights.

This matter concerns four writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated June 6, 2006, of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Appeals Against Dismissal of Section 9 Petition for Interim Measures in Redevelopment Dispute. Non-Signatories to Development Agreement Cannot Be Directed to Vacate Premises Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as They Are Not Bound by Agreement.

The matter arose from a redevelopment dispute concerning Poddar Apartment, a building comprising ground plus four upper floors with 30 flats, 44 shops...