High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Minor Injured in Road Accident — Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Insurer Held Liable to Pay and Recover from Owner Due to Driver Without Valid License.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 27.11.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hiriyur, in MVC No.78/2009. The claimant, Durugamma, a minor aged 10 years, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a road traffic accident on 03.08.2008. While she was walking with her father on Maradihally to Gollarahatty road, an auto rickshaw bearing registration No.KA-16/A-5286 driven by S.G.Naresh (respondent No.1) hit her, causing grievous injuries. The Tribunal awarded total compensation of Rs.69,100/- with interest at 6% per annum, but absolved the insurer (respondent No.3) from liability on the ground that the driver did not possess a valid driving license. The claimant appealed seeking enhancement of compensation and also challenging the exoneration of the insurer. The High Court considered the evidence, including the wound certificate, disability certificate, and the fact that the claimant was a minor. The court noted that the Tribunal had awarded Rs.20,000/- for pain and suffering, Rs.15,000/- for medical expenses, Rs.10,000/- for loss of amenities, Rs.10,000/- for loss of income during treatment, and Rs.14,100/- for future medical expenses. The High Court found that the compensation for loss of future earning capacity was not properly assessed. Applying the multiplier method, the court took the notional income of the minor as Rs.15,000/- per annum (as per the Second Schedule), applied multiplier 15, and assessed 15% permanent disability, resulting in Rs.33,750/- for loss of future earning capacity. The court also enhanced compensation for pain and suffering to Rs.30,000/-, loss of amenities to Rs.20,000/-, and awarded Rs.10,000/- for loss of income during treatment, Rs.15,000/- for medical expenses, and Rs.14,100/- for future medical expenses, totaling Rs.1,22,850/-. However, the court rounded it to Rs.1,50,000/- considering the overall circumstances. Regarding the insurer's liability, the court held that the insurer is liable to pay the compensation to the third party and then recover the same from the owner, following the principle in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Swaran Singh. The appeal was allowed in part, enhancing compensation to Rs.1,50,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till deposit, and the insurer was directed to pay and recover.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation for Minor - Loss of Future Earning Capacity - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 - The claimant, a minor aged 10 years, sustained grievous injuries in a road accident. The Tribunal awarded Rs.69,100/-. The High Court enhanced compensation to Rs.1,50,000/- by applying a notional income of Rs.15,000/- per annum and multiplier of 15, considering the permanent disability of 15% assessed by the doctor. Held that for minors, notional income can be taken as Rs.15,000/- per annum as per Second Schedule to the Act (Paras 8-10).

B) Motor Accident Claims - Liability of Insurer - Breach of Policy Condition - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 149 - The offending vehicle was driven by a person without a valid driving license. The Tribunal absolved the insurer. The High Court upheld the insurer's liability to pay and recover from the owner, following the principle that the insurer must pay third-party compensation and then recover from the insured. Held that the insurer is liable to pay compensation to the claimant and recover the same from the owner (Para 11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper and whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation despite the driver not possessing a valid driving license.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed in part. Compensation enhanced from Rs.69,100/- to Rs.1,50,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till deposit. The insurer is directed to pay the compensation and recover the same from the owner of the vehicle.

Law Points

  • Compensation for injuries to minors
  • multiplier method for loss of future earning capacity
  • notional income for minors
  • contributory negligence
  • liability of insurer when vehicle is driven without valid driving license
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (11) 14

M.F.A.No.1201/2011 [MV]

2016-11-07

S.Sujatha

Harish N.R. for B.M.Siddappa (appellant), Spoorthy Hegde for R2, O.Mahesh for R3

Durugamma (minor, represented by natural guardian mother Yellamma)

S.G.Naresh (driver), S.M.Govindappa (owner), The Manager, Choramandalam M.S.General Insurance Company Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal seeking enhancement of compensation and challenging exoneration of insurer.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation from Rs.69,100/- to a higher amount and direction to insurer to pay compensation.

Filing Reason

Claimant, a minor, sustained grievous injuries in a road accident due to negligence of auto rickshaw driver.

Previous Decisions

Tribunal awarded Rs.69,100/- with interest and absolved insurer from liability.

Issues

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper? Whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation despite the driver not possessing a valid driving license?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the compensation is inadequate and the Tribunal erred in absolving the insurer. Respondent-insurer argued that since the driver had no valid license, the insurer is not liable.

Ratio Decidendi

For minors, notional income can be taken as Rs.15,000/- per annum as per Second Schedule of MV Act. The insurer is liable to pay compensation to third parties even if there is breach of policy condition, with right to recover from the insured.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.69,100/- as compensation. The same is not just and proper. The insurer is liable to pay the compensation to the claimant and recover the same from the owner.

Procedural History

Claim petition filed before MACT, Hiriyur in MVC No.78/2009. Tribunal passed award on 27.11.2010. Claimant filed appeal under Section 173(1) of MV Act before High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166, Section 149, Section 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Minor Injured in Road Accident — Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Insurer Held Liable to Pay and Recover from Owner Due to Driver Without Valid License.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Discharge Application for Absconding Accused in Corruption Case. Court Must Consider Discharge on Merits Regardless of Accused's Absence.