Search Results for "contract basis"

6430 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6430 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions of JTOs Challenging Promotion Policy for Training Officers. The court upheld the validity of the Karnataka Government Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1957 and the promotion policy based on seniority-cum-merit.

The petitioners, who are Junior Training Officers (JTOs) in various Government Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs) in Karnataka, challenged the prom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Complainant in Life Insurance Claim Repudiation Case — Insurer Failed to Prove Suppression of Material Facts. Non-disclosure of existing policies not established by documentary evidence; burden of proof under Section 45 Insurance Act, 1938 not discharged.

The present civil appeal arises from the repudiation of life insurance claims by Future Generali India Life Insurance Company Limited. The appellant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Extension of Toll Collection Period in BOT Road Project. Court holds that concession period extension is a contractual matter and not subject to judicial review under Article 226 in absence of arbitrariness or public interest violation.

The petitioners, claiming to be public-spirited citizens, filed a writ petition in public interest challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Against V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust Regarding Tender Process and Price Bid Opening. Petitioner Challenges Disqualification and Award of Contract to Third Respondent Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s.Coresonant Systems Pvt. Ltd., participated in a tender floated by V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust, Tuticorin, for implementation of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Railway Eviction Notice for Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements. Notice under Section 4 of the Railway Land (Unauthorised Occupation) Act, 1966 must specify the period of occupation and be served on the person in occupation.

The petitioners, Bhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited, M/s. Ramesh Builders, and Rajen Harshadlal Sanghvi, filed a writ petition unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Bank in Possession Suit, Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Possession and Mesne Profits. Counterclaim for Specific Performance of Sale Contract Dismissed as Unenforceable Due to Lack of Registered Agreement and Failure to Prove Readiness and Willingness.

The case involves a dispute over immovable property, Municipal House No.9 at Ahmedpur, consisting of a godown, three rooms, and open space on a plot o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Tender Cancellation Case — Public Interest Justifies Cancellation of LoI Despite Prior Acceptance. Non-Arbitrariness in State Action Not Established When Cancellation is Based on Legitimate Concerns Over Technical Compliance and Financial Viability.

The dispute arose from a tender issued by the State of Himachal Pradesh for the supply, installation, and maintenance of electronic Point-of-Sale (ePO...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition and Allows Writ Appeals in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that cancellation of tender due to change in government policy does not amount to willful disobedience of court order under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The case involves a dispute over a tender issued by the State of Karnataka for the selection of a creative agency for the 'Invest Karnataka 2022' even...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Cancellation of Tender Process for Lease of Plots. Court holds that CIDCO's decision to cancel tender without valid reasons and without issuing show-cause notice to highest bidders is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, M/s. Aditya Enterprises and Mahaavir Superstructures Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions challenging the decision of the City and Industr...