Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Against V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust Regarding Tender Process and Price Bid Opening. Petitioner Challenges Disqualification and Award of Contract to Third Respondent Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s.Coresonant Systems Pvt. Ltd., participated in a tender floated by V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust, Tuticorin, for implementation of an RFID system. The tender notification, bearing No.TRA-COMMORRFID(RFCO)/4/2023-Traffic(e.5003), was issued on 12.02.2024. The petitioner's price bid was not opened, allegedly arbitrarily, leading to the filing of two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In W.P.(MD)No.23924 of 2024, the petitioner sought a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the communication dated 31.07.2024 issued by the Traffic Manager, second respondent, which barred its participation, and to direct respondents 1 and 2 to permit the petitioner to participate and open its price bid. Subsequently, the petitioner filed W.P.(MD)No.25856 of 2024 challenging the order dated 04.09.2024 and the letter of award dated 12.10.2024 awarding the contract to the third respondent, M/s. ITI Ltd., and sought a direction to award the tender to the petitioner by opening its price bid. The third respondent was impleaded by court order dated 21.10.2024. Arguments were heard by Justice L. Victoria Gowri of the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. The case was reserved on 19.11.2024 and judgment delivered on 18.02.2025. The outcome of the petitions is not available in the provided excerpt.

Headnote

A) Tender Law - Disqualification in Tender - Judicial Review - Article 226, Constitution of India - The petitioner challenged the communication/orders rejecting its technical bid and awarding contract to another; sought direction to open price bid - (Paras Not mentioned)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

W.P.(MD)Nos.23924 and 25856 of 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 304

W.P.(MD)Nos.23924 and 25856 of 2024 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.20265, 20267, 20268, 21944, 21946 and 21947 of 2024

2025-02-18

L. Victoria Gowri

For Petitioner: Mr. Issac Mohanlal, Senior Counsel for Mr. A. Joseph Jerry; For Respondents 1 & 2: Mr. B. Saravanan, Senior Counsel for Mr. A. Arivu Chandran; For 3rd Respondent: No Appearance

M/s.Coresonant Systems Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Managing Director, Shankara Krishna Sridev

1.V.O.Chidambaranar Port Trust, represented by its Chairman; 2.The Traffic Manager, V.O.Chidambaranar Port Trust; 3.M/s. ITI Ltd., represented by its Managing Director

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 challenging disqualification in a tender process for implementation of RFID system at V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of communication dated 31.07.2024, order dated 04.09.2024, and letter of award dated 12.10.2024; direction to open petitioner's price bid and award the tender.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's price bid was not opened, allegedly arbitrarily, despite participation in the tender.

Procedural History

Writ petitions filed; third respondent impleaded on 21.10.2024; case reserved on 19.11.2024; judgment delivered on 18.02.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Against V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust Regarding Tender Process and Price Bid Opening. Petitioner Challenges Disqualification and Award of Contract to Third Respondent Under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Validity Dispute. Notice Under Section 34/148 Not Invalidated by Preamble Error or Pending Return.