Search Results for "additional fee"

1952 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1952 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Application in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Unexplained Delay of 822 Days. The court held that the State cannot claim benefit of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 when the delay is not properly explained and the application lacks sufficient cause.

The present applications were filed by the State of Gujarat through the Special Land Acquisition Officer seeking condonation of delay of 822 days in f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Development and Sale Agreement Constitutes Commercial Dispute Under Commercial Courts Act: Karnataka HC

The petitioner challenged the Trial Court’s rejection of an application under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC contending that the suit was a commercial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Succession Act Case — Order Granting Succession Certificate Set Aside for Lack of Notice to All Heirs. Failure to Issue Notice to Appellant Under Section 384 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The appellant, T. Nagendra Setty, filed an appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, challenging the order dated 30.08.2023 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Plaintiff failed to prove title and possession; no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) arises from a suit for declaration and injunction filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to discharge burden of proving the agreement and that the defendant's possession was permissive, leading to dismissal of the suit.

The appellants (defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2015 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Nelamangala, in O.S. No. 82/2010, wh...