Search Results for "Supreme Court discretionary power"

1790 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1790 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Appeals Against Company Law Board's Investigation Order Under Section 237(b)(i) of Companies Act, 1956. Appeals challenge the order directing investigation into the affairs of companies allegedly linked to Ketan Parekh in the 2001 stock scam.

The judgment pertains to 14 appeals filed by various companies alleged to be controlled by Ketan Parekh, the central figure in the 2001 stock market s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Co-Owners — Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC. Discretionary Power Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC Cannot Be Exercised Mechanically Without Showing Prejudice.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Shashikant Yeshwant Pal and Tanaji Yeshwant Pal, and their respective wives, over a house p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order of Temporary Injunction in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Possession. Held That Plaintiffs Have Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Favors Grant of Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The present appeal arises from an order passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panaji, granting a temporary injunction in favour of the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Concurrent Running of Sentences Under Section 482 CrPC for Multiple Convictions in Different Cases. The court held that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be used to order concurrent sentences to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

The judgment involves two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking directions to run multiple...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Tenancy Possession Dispute; Considers Whether Temporary Restraint Order Was Justified

The case arose from a tenancy and possession dispute over Flat No.5, Second Floor, Goolestan, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai. The plaintiff, a senior citizen an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Denial of Exemption for Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty under Section 8C of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Petitioner Asserts Notification No.96/2009-Cus. Intended to Exempt All Safeguard Duties and Phrase 'under section 8B' is Discriminatory.

The petitioner, a public limited company manufacturing pneumatic tyres, regularly imported Carbon Black from the People’s Republic of China. Carbon ...