Search Results for "Section 19(2)"

959 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 959 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicates Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act for Alleged Disproportionate Assets. Appellants Challenged Conviction on Grounds of Procedural Irregularities and Erroneous Calculation of Assets.

The criminal appeal before the Madras High Court arises from a conviction by the Special Judge for CBI Cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Derivative Transaction Dispute Based on Signed ISDA Agreement. Court Finds No Ground to Interfere Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Arbitrator's Findings on Enforceability Are Reasonable.

The dispute arose from two foreign exchange derivative transactions entered into between Sporting India Limited (the Petitioner) and HDFC Bank Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Brother Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive, last seen theory, and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shyam Vishnu Yadav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad on 06.01.2017 for the murder of his brother Namdeo under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Discharge Order in Private Complaint Case — Reiterates That Magistrate Must Apply Judicial Mind at Stage of Issuance of Process Under Section 204 CrPC. Sessions Court Cannot Discharge Accused Without Considering Magistrate's Order and Material on Record.

The petitioner, Shivaji Ananda Pawar, filed a private complaint against several accused, including respondent nos. 1 and 2 (original accused nos. 5 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Cruelty Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Trial Court's Findings Not Perverse; Demand for Money Not Proved as Dowry Demand Under Section 498A IPC.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 24th April 2001 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pimpri i...