Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

21963 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21963 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Foreign Award Execution Case Due to Property Location. Territorial jurisdiction for execution of foreign award under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is determined by location of property to be attached, not by place of cause of action.

The appellant, Wireless Developers Inc., a US company, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Indiagames Ltd., an Indian company, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Applicability of Employees' Provident Funds Act to Pigmy Agents of Cooperative Banks. Writ Petitions Filed by Both Banks and Provident Fund Authorities Challenge Tribunal Orders on Coverage of Such Agents Under Section 18(3)(d) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

A group of writ petitions came before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, filed by multiple cooperative banks and by the Assistant Provident Fund Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross Execution Applications in Share Sale Dispute, Holds Loan Included in Consideration. The court upheld the decree for specific performance of an email agreement, ruling that the loan amount of Rs.10,32,55,000/- was part of the Rs.36.75 crore consideration.

The case arises from a dispute between two groups, the Kotharis and the Agarwals, who were equal shareholders in a company called Special Ear, Nose an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Summons in Medical Negligence Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC — Doctor and Hospital Manager Protected as Public Servants Under Section 2(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case involves two criminal writ petitions filed by Dr. Vivekanand Jawali (a cardiac surgeon) and Mr. Karthik Rajagopal (Zonal Director of Fortis H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeals Against Acquittal in Sohrabuddin Fake Encounter Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Acquittal Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Establish Police-Politician Conspiracy and Connection to Seized Firearms Under Sections 120B, 302 IPC and Section 378 CrPC.

The appeals arose from the judgment of acquittal dated 21 December 2018 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, in Sessions Case Nos. 177 of 2013, 1...