Search Results for "Article 15(3)"

876 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 876 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Mere Change of Opinion Invalid. Reassessment Based on Same Commencement Certificate Date Already Considered in Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Cannot Be Sustained.

The petitioner, M/s. Mistry Lalji Narsi Development Corporation, a partnership firm engaged in development and construction, challenged a notice issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Urban Land Ceiling Act After Repeal Proposal. State Government retains jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 until formal repeal takes effect.

The petitioners, nine individuals and one through their power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the decis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Seek Expert Opinion on Age of Ink in Cheque in Summary Criminal Case Under Negotiable Instruments Act. Interlocutory orders can be modified during trial; Section 362 CrPC bar not attracted.

The petitioner, Mansingh Gopusingh Pawar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Consolidation of Cooperative Disputes for Joint Trial — Revision Order Upheld. Common questions of law and fact justified consolidation under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Tarkude Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a dispute (No.254/2006) before the Cooperative Court, Pune, against The Rupee Cooperative Bank Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live-Link. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Delay of 25 Days in Passing Order Not Satisfactorily Explained by Detaining Authority.

The petitioner, Mandar Ajit Borkar, challenged his preventive detention order dated 14th October 2011 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Services of 73 Employees of Maharashtra State Electricity Board. Termination Upheld as Valid Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Recruitment Rules and Lack of Approval from State Government.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by 73 employees of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board challenging their termination of services. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Withdrawal of Suit by Legal Representatives in Property Dispute — Held That Executors of Deceased Plaintiff's Will Are Necessary Parties and Suit Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Their Consent

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by H.H. Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia and Smt. Madhavi Raje Madhavrao Scindia, who are legal representativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Caste Certificate Must Be from Native Place Authority in Scheduled Tribe Claim Case. Full Bench Answers Reference Affirmatively, Overruling Niraj More's View on Jurisdictional Validity of Caste Certificates.

The case arose from a reference made by a Division Bench in Rajendra Thakur v. State of Maharashtra, which disagreed with the earlier Division Bench d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Partition Suit and Upholds Wills in Family Property Dispute. Wills and Codicils Executed by Testator and Testatrix Found Valid, No Undue Influence or Lack of Testamentary Capacity Established.

The judgment concerns a family dispute over the estate of Chimanlal Chinai and his wife Shardaben Chinai. The plaintiffs, legal heirs of Dinkar Chinai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Eviction Order in Slum Rehabilitation Case. Court upholds MHADA's jurisdiction to evict unauthorized occupants from transit accommodation under Section 3M of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by 16 individuals who were occupants of transit accommodation in a building known as 'Sukh Sadan' in Go...