Search Results for "trial necessary"

13807 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13807 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act — Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Invalid as Full Disclosure Was Made During Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Plus Paper Food Pac Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 18.11.2013 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Police Officers for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Insufficient Medical Evidence in Alleged Police Atrocities Case Under IPC Sections 323 and 326

The High Court allowed the criminal application filed by two police officers seeking to quash criminal proceedings and an order issuing process agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Impleadment in Specific Performance Suit — Petitioners Not Necessary or Proper Parties Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC. Leasehold Rights Acquired Pending Suit Are Subject to Lis Pendens and Do Not Entitle Impleadment.

The petitioners, Sandeep Ramesh Solanki and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

SUIT (L) NO. 204 OF 2017.

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interlocutory Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Order Rejecting Permission to File Fresh Valuation Report Is Not an Interim Award and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34.

The dispute arises from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 22.12.2003 between Dilip Timblo (appellant) and Prashant Timblo (respondent). The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Declares Demolition of Shop without Notice Illegal under Section 23 of Karnataka State Highways Act, 1964. Tenant's Possession Protected When Authorities Demolish Building Without Following Procedural Mandate.

The petitioner was a tenant running a textile shop in a building at Magadi Town, measuring 19 feet by 76 feet, referred to as Schedule-B property. He ...