Search Results for "possession delay"

3781 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3781 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Plaint in Civil Suit — Due Diligence Test Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Not Applicable Before Commencement of Trial. Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Amendment Application on Ground of Lack of Due Diligence When Trial Had Not Commenced.

The petitioners, plaintiffs in a civil suit (O.S. No. 188/2015) pending before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Hungund, filed an application (IA ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Consolidation Scheme Orders -- Petitioner's 38-Year Delayed Application for Rectification Rejected -- State Minister's Order Upheld

The petitioner challenged orders dated 09 July 2015 and 15 July 2014 related to a land consolidation scheme implemented in 1974 -- The petitioner clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case with Modified Compensation Directions. Deemed acquisition date set as 17.05.1996 under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with compensation based on market price at that time but no interest for delay period.

The dispute arose from the State of Himachal Pradesh's use of private land for constructing a road from Banuti to Pahal in 1996 without formal acquisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Criminal Appeal Challenging Conviction for Rape of Cousin Sister Resulting in Pregnancy. DNA Report Established Accused and Victim as Biological Parents of Child Born Under Sections 376, 376(2)(f), 376(2)(n) Indian Penal Code.

The appeal arises from a judgment of conviction rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Case No. 55 of 2020 dated 20.8.2022. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Ruling That Time Limit Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is Directory. The provision requiring District Magistrate to pass possession order within 30 days (extendable to 60 days) is directory, as non-compliance does not invalidate proceedings or prejudice the borrower.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that the time limit under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Tenant at will cannot claim adverse possession; suit for possession based on title is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The present second appeal arises from a suit for permanent injunction and possession filed by the original plaintiffs (now respondents) against the de...