Search Results for "life members"

4414 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4414 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 498-A IPC Involving Allegations of Cruelty for Dowry Demand. The Court Examines the Definition of Cruelty and the Requirement of Continuous Harassment Under Section 498-A Explanation (b).

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant-husband under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Civil Application in PIL Challenging Order to Destroy Tigress Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Permission to Hunt Man-Eater Tigress Upheld as Chief Wildlife Warden’s Satisfaction Was Based on Relevant Material Without Overstepping Statutory Powers.

The petitioner, Dr. Jerryl Avinash Banait, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging an order dated 9.10.2017 passed by the Chief Wildlife ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Cognizability of Section 63 of Copyright Act in Writ Petition by Cab Aggregator; Issue Involves Classification of Offence Punishable with Imprisonment up to Three Years.

Background: The dispute arose from a complaint filed by Lahari Recording Company (respondent no. 2), a music company, against ANI Technologies Pvt. Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Husband in Suicide Case — No Prima Facie Case of Dowry Death Established. Court Holds Ingredients of Section 304B IPC Not Satisfied as Allegations Lacked Dowry Harassment, Quashes FIR for Offences Under Sections 304B, 313, 498A IPC.

The petitioner-husband filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash Crime No.139/2022 registered by Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Management Officials in Employee Suicide Case Disciplinary Actions for Unauthorised Absence Did Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide Under Section 306 IPC Due to Lack of Proximate Nexus.

The litigation arose from the suicide of Parashuram N.K., an employee of Harihar Polyfibers, and the subsequent FIR filed by his father against the ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal Against Rejection of Bail in POTA Serial Bomb Blasts Case. The Court Examines the Interpretation of Section 49(6) and (7) POTA and Applicability of Bail Restrictions After One Year of Detention.

The appeal arose from the rejection of bail by the Special Judge under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (POTA) in connection with three serial bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Proximate Instigation and Corroboration. Conviction under Section 306 IPC Set Aside as Handwriting Expert Opinion and Threatening Letter Alone Insufficient to Prove Abetment Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, original accused no. 1, by the Sessions Court under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code for ab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Takes Suo Moto Cognizance of COVID-19 Public Health Infrastructure in Maharashtra. Court Refers to Earlier Principal Seat Judgment Highlighting State's Obligation Under Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 and Disaster Management Act, 2005.

On 26.06.2020, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, registered Suo Moto Criminal Public Interest Litigation No.1 of 2020 to ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notice and Order by MCGM in Alleged Unauthorized Construction Case Finding Malafide Action. The Court held that the works were not in progress and the action under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 constituted legal malice.

The petitioner, a film actor, purchased a bungalow in Bandra, Mumbai in 2017. In 2018, she carried out a structural audit and sought permission from t...