Search Results for "incorrect particulars"

1047 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1047 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation Awarded to Legal Heirs of Deceased. Multiplier of 15 under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 held applicable based on deceased's age of 35 years.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, filed a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Textile Mill Land Sale. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any legal right to compel conclusion of sale after tender was cancelled due to non-compliance with terms.

The petitioner, M/s Drushti Engineers & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced for Widow and Children. Future Prospects and Loss of Consortium Granted Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the claimants (widow, children, and parents of the deceased) against the judgment and award dated 3rd April 2018 in MACP No. 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Activist in UAPA Case for Failure to File Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. The court held that the right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is indefeasible and the period of house arrest cannot be excluded from the computation of the 90-day period.

The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, a 69-year-old scholar, writer, and civil rights activist, was arrested on 28/10/2018 in connection with FIR No. 4 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Stale Grounds. Single FIR and Bail Not Sufficient to Treat Detenu as Dangerous Person Affecting Public Order.

The petitioner, Vishal Aananda Mahabal, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootlegger...