Search Results for "composite consideration"

984 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 984 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Pillion Rider Covered Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Held that the expression 'any person' in Section 163-A includes a pillion rider and that the petition is maintainable even in a hit-and-run case.

The appellant, Lalita wd/o Rajkumar Sawalkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which was later converted to a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Bar Council Rule Limiting Regular Approval of Law Colleges to Five Years. Rule 2(xxiv) of the Rules of Legal Education 2008 Held Intra Vires the Advocates Act, 1961; Permanent Approval Status Not Recognized Under New Rules.

The petitioners, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University and its Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar College of Law, challenged the validity of Rule 2(xxiv) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence of Truck Driver Established by Evidence. The Court set aside the Tribunal's finding of no negligence and remanded for fresh consideration.

The appellant, Mrs. Agustha D' Souza Cardozo, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, South Goa, seeking compensation for in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Demise of Arbitrator and Insolvency of Party Held Sufficient Cause for Extension Despite Lack of Consent Under Section 29-A(3).

The petitioners, Scape Marketing Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Dispute Due to Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The award was based on no evidence and misreading of the agreement, ignoring letters that modified the restriction on telecast rights.

The petitioner, Radha Krshna Films Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 05/01/2007 passed by the Joint Tribunal of the Film Makers Combine (FMC) a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retail Outlet Dealership Selection for Arbitrary Marking. Court directs reassessment of marks for 'Liquid cash' criterion and fresh selection process.

The petitioner, Shri Pundalik Tukaram Chowgule, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the selection process for a Reta...