Search Results for "void alienation"

244 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 244 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Plaint Not Barred by Section 10 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Agreement to Sell with Restriction on Alienation Does Not Render Contract Void Under Section 10 of TPA.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 24.01.2023 executed by the respondent/defendant in respect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Restrains Interference and Construction Pending Suit. Prima facie case established regarding joint family property and partnership firm rights under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The appellants, Mr. Parth Ghorpade and Mr. Sarvajeet Ghorpade, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) read with Section 151 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of Subsequent Purchaser in SC/ST Land Transfer Case — Deputy Commissioner's Order Quashed. Sale of Granted Land After Expiry of 15-Year Non-Alienation Period Held Valid Under Section 4(2) of Karnataka SC/ST (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978.

The petitioner, Smt. R. Sarojini Devi, a subsequent purchaser of land, challenged the order of the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru District, da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Suit for Compensation and Declaration of Sale Agreement as Void. Amendment Sought to Challenge Agreement for Sale of Property Allegedly Purchased with Siphoned Funds Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

The Plaintiff, Edit II Productions, filed a suit seeking compensation for financial loss caused by the Defendants who allegedly siphoned funds from th...