Search Results for "undertaking letter"

2658 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2658 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides Arbitration Petition Challenging Award in Advertising Rights Tender Dispute. Court Examines Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The arbitration petition arose from a tender floated by Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) on 9 November 2018 for allotment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging AAI's Refusal to Issue Revised NOC for Building Height in Slum Rehabilitation Project. Court Holds That Substantial Compliance with Procedural Requirements Suffices and That the Authorization Letter Dated 11 July 2016 Must Be Treated as Final NOC.

The petitioners, developers implementing a slum rehabilitation scheme in Chembur, Mumbai, sought a revised No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Air...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules on Arbitration Petition No.846 of 2014 Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The Court Considers Whether the Arbitral Award Dated 22 March 2014 Should Be Set Aside in Light of Various Share Sale Agreements Between the Parties.

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from an arbitration petition filed by Haresh Advani under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Lease by BEST Undertaking Without Following Principles of Natural Justice. Lease Termination Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice as No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given.

The petitioner, Fortpoint Automotive Private Limited, was allotted a portion of land at Mahim Bus Depot by the Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.

The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Finds Reliance Companies Guilty of Contempt for Breach of Undertakings to Pay INR 550 Crore to Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. The court held that the undertakings making payment conditional upon sale of assets were contrary to the court's order and constituted wilful disobedience.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with three contempt petitions filed by Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. against Reliance Communications Ltd., Reliance Teleco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Suit for Redemption of Pledged Securities After Loan Default; Plaintiffs Abandoned Main Claim of Transfer Agreement. Pledge Agreement Clause 14(ii) Notice and Default by Pledgor Form Core of Dispute Over Shares of Sesa Sterlite.

The suit was filed by Harinarayan G. Bajaj and others against Reliance Capital Limited and Sesa Sterlite Limited. Plaintiffs borrowed a total of Rs.10...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enforcement of Consent Terms Against Non-Signatory Defendant in Debenture Dispute. Interpretation of Consent Decree Held That Clause 11(a) Obligation to Pay Was Only on Defendant No.5, Not Defendant No.6, Who Was Not a Party to the Consent Terms.

The case involves two appeals filed by the original Defendant No.5 (Dewanchand Ramsaran Trading Pvt. Ltd. and others) against a common order of the le...