Search Results for "truthfulness verification"

136 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 136 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Detention Order Under MPDA Act, 1981; Representations and Delay Issues Considered. Court Finds No Merit in Allegation of Non-Forwarding of Representation as Detenu's Son Voluntarily Took Back Copies, While Delay Explanation Was Noted.

The petitioner-detenu challenged his detention order dated 22.06.2005 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Orders.

The petitioner, Shailesh Dnyaneshwar Kedar, challenged a detention order dated 23 November 2014 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Evaluates Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Distinction Between Public Order and Law and Order. Predicate Offences Involving Property Dispute and House Trespass May Not Justify Preventive Detention as Activities Prejudicial to Maintenance of Public Order.

This writ petition challenged a preventive detention order passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction Under Gang Rape and Assault Provisions; Conviction Under Sections 376(D), 323, 504, 506 R/W 34 IPC Challenged. Appellants Contend Unreliable Identification, Absence of Injuries, and Investigative Lapses Undermine Prosecution Case.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard three criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom in Panchkula Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial evidence including call detail records and IMEI numbers sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 364A, 392, 120B IPC.

The appellants were convicted by the trial court for kidnapping a boy, Sachin Garg, for ransom, robbery, and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Pena...