Search Results for "tribunal order set aside"

8550 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8550 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Award Directing Absorption of Contract Workers as Permanent Employees. Tribunal's Finding of Sham Contract Upheld as Workers Were Directly Supervised and Paid by Principal Employer Under CLRA Act, 1970.

The Airports Authority of India (AAI), a statutory body, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Award dated 26 Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Warrant Against Education Officer in Execution Proceedings — State Officer Not Personally Liable for Decree Dues. Executing Court Cannot Direct Arrest or Recovery Against Government Officer Without Finding of Wilful Default Under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC.

The case arises from execution proceedings of a decree passed by the School Tribunal, Pune, in Appeal No. 104 of 1998, directing the reinstatement of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition under Section 34 of Arbitration Act and Confirms Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute; Appeal Under Section 37 Arises. Single Judge's Order Upholds Award Holding Breach of Contract by Not Supplying DTC Lists

The appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB)/Maharashtra State El...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Computation of Excess Vacant Land under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Challenges to Vesting Orders. Petitioner Company Claims Non-Buildable Land and Earlier Surrendered Area Must Be Excluded While Computing Excess Vacant Land.

The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urban Lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Revenue Appeal Against ITAT Order in Section 263 Revision Case. Appeal Concerns Whether Non-Verification of Utilization of Accumulated Income Under Section 11(2) Renders Assessment Order Erroneous and Prejudicial to Revenue.

The matter arose from an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before the Bombay High Court against the order of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Raman & Raman Ltd. in Stage Carriage Permit Matter, Quashing Appellate Authority's Order. Section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Holds Only Administrative Power; Directions Issued Are Not Law and Cannot Affect Prior Permits.

The appellant, M/s. Raman & Raman Ltd., was one of several applicants for a stage carriage permit. The Regional Transport Authority granted the permit...