
The Bombay High Court quashed the reassessment order dated September 30, 2022, passed against Wavy Construction LLP under Sections 147, 143(3), and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on grounds of being barred by limitation under Section 153(2). The Court emphasized adherence to statutory timelines and procedural fairness in assessment proceedings.
Income Tax Act, 1961:
Constitution of India:
Wavy Construction LLP filed its income tax return for AY 2012-13 on September 29, 2012. Initial scrutiny was completed under Section 143(1), and no assessment was reopened for years.
In 2019, the Department issued a notice under Section 148, citing the sale of property amounting to ₹9 crores in AY 2012-13, alleging escapement of ₹4.13 crore taxable income.
The petitioner raised objections to the reopening, asserting the lack of adequate reasons and questioning procedural validity. The objections were dismissed by the assessing officer.
A writ petition was filed in 2019, and the High Court granted a stay on reassessment proceedings. The Court remanded the matter back for reconsideration in September 2021.
The petitioner argued that the reassessment proceedings and notices issued post-November 20, 2021, exceeded the statutory limitation under Section 153(2) and were therefore invalid.
The Revenue argued for an extended limitation under Section 153(6) due to the High Court's remand order, claiming sufficient compliance with procedural directions.
The Court held that the limitation period for reassessment expired on November 20, 2021, even after accounting for the stay period. The reassessment order dated September 30, 2022, was quashed as time-barred.
Income Tax, Limitation, Reassessment, Procedural Fairness
Income Tax Act, Section 147, Reassessment, High Court, Faceless Assessment, Limitation Period, Procedural Violation.
Case Title: Wavy Construction LLP Versus Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-22(1) & Ors.
Citation: 2024 LawText (BOM) (12) 200
Case Number: WRIT PETITION NO. 4372 OF 2022
Date of Decision: 2024-12-20