Search Results for "setting aside exparte decree"

203 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 203 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to DRAT Order Upholding DRT Dismissal of Recall of Ex-Parte Decree in Debt Recovery Proceedings. Petitioners Contend Non-Service of Summons and Advocate's Mere Filing of Vakalatnama Cannot Waive Service, Which Is Essential for Written Statement.

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Rejection of Obstruction Application in Execution Proceedings. Execution Court Dismissed Application Under Order XXI Rule 97 Without Enquiry, Allegedly Violating Order XXI Rule 101 CPC.

The petitioner, a third party objecting to the execution of a decree for vacant possession, challenged the order of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Scrutinizes Validity of Auction Sale in Execution Proceedings Due to Notice Irregularities. Compliance with Order XXI Rule 66(2) CPC and Affixing of Proclamation on Court-House Examined in Appeal Against Confirmation of Sale.

The appeal arose from an order of the City Civil Court dismissing a notice of motion seeking to set aside an ex parte decree and the subsequent auctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition for Possession Against Tenant in Arbitration Dispute — Interim Relief Denied as Disputed Questions of Fact Require Trial

The petitioner, M/s. Gandhi Adhivitiya Combine, a developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Obstructionists in Execution of Possession Decree — Upholds Order for Removal of Obstruction Under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC. Decree for possession passed in 1964 suit; obstructionists claiming independent title failed to prove possession prior to decree.

The appeal arose from an order in Chamber Summons No. 597 of 1996 in B.C.C.C. Suit No. 2056 of 1964, decided by the City Civil Court on 24.4.1998. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition Challenging Maintenance Award Under Section 125 CrPC Due to Non-Prosecution. Maintenance of Rs. 2000 for Wife and Rs. 1000 for Child Upheld as Reasonable.

The petitioner, Nitin Kumar Mahant, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...