Search Results for "selection seniority"

664 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 664 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Departmental Promotion Committee Recommendations in Postal Department Recruitment. Court Holds That Candidates Who Were Not Considered for Promotion Due to Non-Inclusion of Their Names in the Zone of Consideration Must Be Considered Afresh.

The petitioners, a group of 86 individuals employed in various capacities such as Postal Assistant, Sorting Assistant, Postman, and Mail Guard in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Retired Employee's Writ Petition for Retrospective Grade Benefits Due to Delay and Laches. Delay of 16 Years from Retirement and Acceptance of Earlier Grade Assignments Precluded Claim for Revision Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The writ petitioner, a retired Senior Bailiff, joined judicial service as Dalayat in 1971 and was regularised in 1973. He was granted Selection Grade ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Rajasthan High Court's Decision to Fix Minimum Cut-Off Marks After Examination in Translator Recruitment. Fixing 75% Cut-Off After Examination Held Impermissible as It Alters Selection Procedure Mid-Process Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The case arose from a recruitment process initiated by the Rajasthan High Court in 2009 for 13 posts of Translators. The applicable rules, as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion Policy Based on Merit-Cum-Seniority in High Court Administration. Court upholds that marks in departmental examination are not the sole criterion for promotion and that seniority can be given weightage under the applicable rules.

The petitioner, Kishore D. Raorane, joined the High Court administration on the Original Side as a Clerk in 1985 and retired as Master (Adm) in 2021. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Seniority Protection in Municipal Corporation Promotion. Petitioner's claim for deemed promotion date from 1997 fails as he was not empanelled due to adverse confidential reports and lack of vigilance clearance.

The petitioner, Ravindra Murlidhar Kalekar, was appointed as a Sub Engineer (Civil) with the Mumbai Municipal Corporation on 3rd February 1975. He was...