Search Results for "section 2(14)"

802 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 802 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Composite Show Cause Notice Issued Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Multiple Tax Periods

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development and registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Cognizability of Section 63 of Copyright Act in Writ Petition by Cab Aggregator; Issue Involves Classification of Offence Punishable with Imprisonment up to Three Years.

Background: The dispute arose from a complaint filed by Lahari Recording Company (respondent no. 2), a music company, against ANI Technologies Pvt. Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Against Tribunal Order Upholding Withholding of Pension. Challenge centres on validity of departmental enquiry initiated post-retirement under Rule 14A of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957.

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution was filed by a retired Revenue Inspector challenging the order of the Karnataka State...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010008432018_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Validity of Designation of Senior Advocates Without Framed Rules Under Advocates Act, 1961. Petitioners Seek to Quash Notifications and Require High Court to Frame Rules for Designation of Senior Advocates.

These writ petitions were filed in public interest by two advocates practicing in the High Court of Karnataka, challenging notifications dated 30.06.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Orders Refusing to Enforce Settlement Under Section 634A of Companies Act, 1956. The appeal challenged the binding nature of an order recording broad settlement when consent terms were unsigned and third-party interests were involved.

The appeal arose from two orders of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 2 July 2004 and 13 September 2004, which held that an earlier CLB order dated 29...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 295A IPC and Section 67 IT Act in WhatsApp Group Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Insufficient Evidence -- Petitioner Acquitted of Religious Offence Charges

The Karnataka High Court allowed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an FIR registered under Section 295A IPC and...