Search Results for "sales promotion employees"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "sales promotion employees"

129 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Decides Tax Deduction at Source Liability for Cellular Mobile Service Providers Under Income Tax Act, 1961 - The Court clarified that obligation under Section 194-H requires principal-agent relationship between payer and payee as per Section 182 of Contract Act, 1872, and payments must be for services in buying/selling goods or asset transactions, not being securities.

28 Feb 2024

The Supreme Court delivered a common judgment addressing appeals by the Revenue and assessees, who were cellular mobile telephone service providers, c...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

30 Sep 2015

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award on Wage Parity for Mumbai Workers. Court holds that Tribunal erred in granting wage parity between Mumbai and Taloja units without considering financial capacity and other relevant factors under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

25 Jul 2019

The case involves two writ petitions arising from an award of the Industrial Tribunal in a wage dispute between VVF Limited Employees' Union (the Unio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Involving Perfume Brands. Court restrains defendants from using marks deceptively similar to plaintiffs' registered trademarks and artistic logos, finding prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

7 May 2026

The plaintiffs, Ahmed Perfumes LLC and M/s. Ahmed Al Maghribi Perfumes Trading LLC, both UAE-based companies in the perfume business, filed a Commerci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Order on Maintainability of Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. The court held that an order refusing to try maintainability as a preliminary issue is not a final order and thus not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226.

25 Jan 2005

The petitioners, Dattaram Panchal and others, filed a complaint before the Labour Court at Mumbai alleging that the first respondent, M/s. Nirlon Limi...

High Court

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3301 OF 2018

9 Apr 2025

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by BMTC in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation Due to Multiplier Error. Tribunal's Use of Multiplier '18' for Deceased Aged 30 Years Held Incorrect; Proper Multiplier is '17' Under Sarla Verma Guidelines.

29 Jun 2026

The appellant, Managing Director of Motor Claims Hub, BMTC, challenged the judgment and award dated 01.01.2022 passed by the XIV Additional Small Caus...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

10 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Recovery Proceeding Under MRTU & PULP Act — Recovery Application Filed Beyond Limitation Period Held Not Maintainable. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that the application under Section 50 of the MRTU & PULP Act was barred by limitation as it was not filed within the prescribed period.

9 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Vidyu Metallics Employees Union, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1923, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case in Trademark Dispute Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Allegations of deceptive similarity in tea packaging held to be primarily a civil trademark infringement matter, not warranting criminal prosecution under Sections 420, 34 IPC and Sections 27, 28, 103, 104 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

24 Sep 2018

The Bombay High Court, at its Aurangabad bench, considered a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking q...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)