KAHC010480352008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "residuary"
557 result(s) found
Found 557 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Declaration and Permanent Injunction. Plaintiff's Title Established Through Registered Sale Deed and Tax Records, Defendant's Adverse Possession Claim Fails for Lack of Evidence.
5 Mar 2015The Regular First Appeal was filed by the defendant against the judgment and decree dated 16.4.2009 passed by the XV Additional City Civil Judge, Bang...
- 67
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Revision Petition in Arbitration Dispute Under Bihar Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008 - Reference Not Barred by Limitation as Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 Applies and Tribunal Had Power to Extend Period Under Section 18 of the 2008 Act.
15 Mar 2022The dispute originated from a works contract for drainage work in an industrial area, awarded by the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority to th...
- 230
High Court
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Manufacturer for Refund of Octroi Duty on Imported Chemical Intermediate. Sulphonic Acid, a Raw Material for Detergents, Not Covered Under Entry 18 of Schedule H to the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 as It Is Not a Substance Used in Washing.
25 Feb 2005The petitioner, Hindustan Lever Limited, a manufacturer of soaps and detergents, imported Sulphonic Acid, a toxic chemical intermediate used as raw ma...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Land Used for Development Plan Road in Pune. Land Not a Public Street Under Section 224 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, Hence Society Entitled to Consideration for TDR.
15 Sep 2023The petitioner, Shri Chhatrapati Rajaram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned land bearing Survey No.682/A at Bibavewadi, Pune. A layout plan was ...
- 51
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Limitation Bar — Winding Up Petition Filed Beyond Three Years from Default Date Cannot Be Revived Under IBC. The Court held that a time-barred winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be treated as a valid Section 7 application under the IBC, and the filing of a suit for specific performance does not extend limitation for a winding up petition.
25 Sep 2019The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from the admission of a winding up petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The pet...
- 290
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Consent Terms Binding on Successor Developer. Petitioners' Entitlement to Two Shops of 409 Sq Ft Each Upheld Based on Consent Terms in Suit No.1994 of 2008.
20 Aug 2024The petitioners, Alphonso D'Souza and Vanessa D'Souza, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 5th January 2022 passed by the Apex Grievances...
- 371
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Housing Loan Disbursement — No Privity of Contract Between Complainant and Bank. Complainant Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as No Service Was Hired or Availed from the Appellant Bank.
20 Mar 2025The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondent (original complainant) against the appellant bank before the National Cons...
- 1159
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Housing Dispute Over Plot Identification — Court Holds That Cooperative Court Has Jurisdiction Under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 to Determine Plot Boundaries and That the Appellant Was Rightfully Allotted Plot No. 12.
3 Aug 2017The appellant, Ku. Shalini Patil (since deceased, represented by her legal heir Rupesh Patil), was a member of the Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Cooperative ...
- 73
