Search Results for "recovery after retirement"

546 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 546 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Post-Retirement Re-Fixation of Pay Without Notice. Re-fixation of pay after retirement without affording opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Naeem Ahmedkhan s/o Dilawarkhan, a retired government servant, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Retired Judicial Officer Initiated After Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement. Disciplinary proceedings initiated after acceptance of voluntary retirement are without jurisdiction as the employer-employee relationship ceases upon retirement.

The petitioner, a retired District Judge, challenged the initiation and continuation of disciplinary proceedings against her after her request for vol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Retiral Benefits Against APMC. Court Directs Payment of Provident Fund, Leave Encashment, and Salary Differences as Per Seventh Pay Commission, Upholding Order of District Deputy Registrar.

The petitioner, Laxman Vitthalrao Motegaonkar, was appointed as Junior Clerk by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Sangamner, on 09.09....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensionary Benefits to Retired Employee Despite Upholding Removal Order Due to Delay. Petitioner's challenge to removal dismissed as barred by laches, but court directs payment of pension and gratuity as per rules.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar s/o Devidas Deshmukh, a retired Tax Collector from Amravati Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Income Tax Commissioner's Petition for Full Pension and Retiral Benefits. Rule of 50% Deduction for Less Than 10 Years Qualifying Service Under Rule 49(2)(b) of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 Not Applicable to Petitioner Who Served Over 30 Years.

The petitioner, B.B. Rajendra Prasad, a retired Commissioner of Income Tax, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Central Administrati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Pay Due to Suppression of Material Undertaking. Employee Bound by Written Undertaking to Refund Excess Payments and Failure to Disclose It Violated Principle of Clean Hands in Writ Jurisdiction.

The writ petition arose from orders dated 18.11.2019 and 22.11.2019 issued by the Sub-Divisional Engineer, Civil, Zilla Parishad, Vaijapur, directing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Regularization of Suspension Period and Retiral Benefits for Teacher in Service Law Matter. Period of Suspension Treated as Duty for Pension and Other Benefits Under Articles 14, 16, and 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sudha Menendbhai Odedra, was appointed as a Vidya Sahayak (teacher) on 14/03/1989 and later promoted to Principal of a higher secondar...