Search Results for "pedestrian injury"

90 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Partly in Fatal Accident Case, Reduces Sentence for Rash Driving. Court holds that conviction under Section 304-A IPC without specific charge is valid if no prejudice, and reduces sentence to period already undergone for young driver with family.

The appellant, Rajkumar Dhunichand Sharma, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, for offences under Sections 307 and 304-A of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Fatal Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge Under Section 304 IPC. The court held that the blood alcohol level was within permissible limits under Section 185 MV Act and that custodial interrogation was not required.

The applicant, a female MBA graduate and businesswoman, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in connection with a fatal hit-and-run acciden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of State Transport Driver for Murder and Rampage in Confirmation Case and Appeal. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 381, 427 IPC and Section 3(2) Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act Affirmed; Insanity Defence Rejected.

The Bombay High Court dealt with a confirmation case for death sentence and a criminal appeal arising from the conviction of Santosh Maruti Mane, a dr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder in Illicit Liquor Dispute — Knife Attack Causing Grievous Injuries. Appellants convicted under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC for stabbing victim multiple times; medical evidence and eyewitness testimony corroborated.

The case arises from an incident on 30 August 2011, where the appellants Chandrakant, Nanaji, and Suryakant Shingade attacked Subhash Kanoje with a kn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Driving License in Motor Vehicle Act Case — Lack of Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Petitioner's license suspended under Section 19(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 without prior notice or opportunity to show cause.

The petitioner, a driver employed with KSRTC, was involved in a road accident on 25.08.2014 while driving a bus. An FIR was registered under Sections ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Driving License in Motor Vehicle Act Case — Lack of Notice and Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. License Suspension Order Set Aside as Authority Failed to Provide Show Cause Notice Before Suspension Under Section 19(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Neelappagouda S/o Virupaxgouda Patil, was a driver employed with KSRTC. On 25.08.2014, while driving a bus bearing No.KA-19F/2461 on N...