Search Results for "pancha witness"

595 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 595 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Vishwas @ Guddu Rajesh Dahiwale, Kamlesh @ Kamya Kalidas Patil, and Suraj Raju Manwatkar, were convicted by the trial court for the mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Dying Declaration Found Unsafe as It Was Not Recorded in Deceased's Vernacular and Contained Overwritings, Leading to Acquittal Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Prakash s/o Rupa Rathod, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Jalna, on 21-03-2012 in Sessions Case No.121 of 2012 for the murd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Double Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dattatray Shankar Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai for the murder of his wife Mangala and son Omkar under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused in Market Committee Secretary Murder Case — Acquits Two Others on Benefit of Doubt. Conspiracy and motive established through evidence of prior enmity and recovery of weapons.

The case pertains to the murder of the secretary of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) at Navi Mumbai. The prosecution alleged that the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Recovery and Hearsay Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Digambar s/o Bhivsan Tribhuvan, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of Bharat, allegedly due ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Contradict Each Other and Complainant's Testimony is Unreliable Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Laxman s/o Narayan Kale, a government servant working with Nagpur Improvement Trust, was convicted by the Special Judge for demanding a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and House Trespass in Brother-in-Law Killing Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 449 and 302 IPC.

The appellant, Laxman Pandurang Pawar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, for offences punishable under Sections 449 (house-trespass in or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unproven Demand. Sanctioning Authority's Lack of Competence and Failure to Prove Demand by Gesture Alone Lead to Acquittal Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case arose from a criminal appeal against the conviction of Shankar Babarao Mukkawar, a former Executive Engineer with the Maharashtra Jivan Pradh...